Sea Tow Franchise | Sale, Cost, Fee, Opportunities.

Sea Tow Franchise Year of Business Begin: 1983

Headquartered In: Southold N.Y

CEO and FOUNDER: Capt. Joseph Frohnhoefer

Sea Tow Franchises run an International marine assistance business Sea Tow is a way of life.

Sea tow basically means a 24/7  loyal commitment to do right by the recreational boating community and to make sure their safety and peace of mind on the water. Those who choose this lifestyle agree that purchasing a Sea Tow is the most difficult, but most rewarding, career they’ve ever had.

What makes common is that you become one of 700 captains and crew of the Sea Tow network who believe that any day spent on the water beats a day at the office.

#1. Sea Tow Franchise Opportunities

What are the sea tow franchise opportunities:

Sea Tow is identified as a leader in marine assistance, it does have 100 franchises all over the United States and Europe.

Captains are recognized on their professionalism and its signature yellow boats, it’s no wonder Sea Tow is the industry standard for non-emergency on-water assistance.

Running side by side with the U.S. Coast Guard on an emergency call, at the end of the day you know you’ve chosen a career that helps your fellow boaters

#2.  Sea Tow Franchise Cost

How much sea tow franchise cost. The capital of the business varies on Area Of Responsibility (AOR)

1)  Franchise Fee:  From $5,500 to $35,000

2)  Initial Start Up Investment: Between $125,000 and $275,000

3)  Liquid Capital: $50,000 

4)  Minimum Net Worth: $200,000 

Related Franchise Business Ideas:

1800 Got junk franchise

Yogurtland franchise

Wetzel pretzel franchise

9 Round franchise

#3. Sea Tow Franchise for Sale

SeaTow Franchise for Sale Support System….

1)  New franchise training at corporate headquarters

2)  Annual meeting of corporate representatives and franchise owners

3)  Continuing education through regional conference calls, Webinars and hands-on training

4)  State-of-the-art membership software program

5)  24-hour customer service center and membership support teams

6)  National advertising and marketing support

7)  Regional advertising and marketing development

8)  Media relations training and support

9)  National Web site, hosted and maintained by STSI

10)  Lifelines member magazine

11)  Sea News electronic newsletter

12)  Secure Intranet and online discussion forum for franchise owners


 Matt Wilson at 843-814-5112 or email at

More information is also available online:

About The Author

1 thought on “Sea Tow Franchise | Sale, Cost, Fee, Opportunities.”

  1. Be aware that Sea Tow is not registered with the NYS attorney general as a franchisor. They claim they are exempt (they are not). Because they are based in NY, they are required to register with the NYS AG. The NYS AG then must approve all changes to the FDD and franchise agreements. The NY AG also protects the consumer rights of franchisors. Sea Tow franchisors do not enjoy that consumer protections. There is currently a court case in Florida that is likely to hold Sea Tow’s feet to the fire on this matter.
    As per PACER, on 08/27/2023, Sea Tow Services International (STSI) co-counsel Steven Altman withdraws as counsel from the STSI v. Tampa Bay Recovery Inc. (TBRI) case citing, “In this case, the client has both orally and in writing (1) questioned my work product, (2) claimed I mishandled certain matters, (3) insisted that I simply follow directions on legal strategy and tactics, (4) sought to have me pursue legal strategies and theories which were contrary to my belief of the state of the law and my professional judgment, (5) exhibited a lack of trust and confidence in my work, and (6) repeatedly been demeaning both professionally and personally.” (Doc 241-1, 08/27/20230)
    This would be the second counsel to withdraw from representing STSI in this matter.
    This withdrawal comes one day after the STSI team received a 5-page motion to compel with multiple exhibits from John Karol, counsel for TBRI, which calls for sanctions against Mitch Stein and Joe Frohnhoefer for failing to comply with court-ordered discovery and also alludes to multiple crimes (Doc 242, 08/28/2023).
    These crimes include claims arising under the New York Franchise Sales Act (“NYFSA”) that may be categorized as (1) registration-based violations; (2) disclosure-based violations; and (3) fraud-based violations. (see attached NYS Franchise Law Violations.pdf)
    The reader of these documents may infer that the withdrawal of counsel following the motion to compel is no coincidence. While it is not unusual for counsel to withdraw, it is quite uncommon for an attorney to suggest his former client and co-counsel were involved in questionable legal practices. It certainly lends credibility to the concerns laid bare in the Karol motion to compel.
    In response, STSI’s sole remaining counsel, Mitch Stein, issued a letter accusing Mr. Altman of all kinds of malfeasance (Doc 244, 08/28/2023). The letter begins with Mr. Stein reminding the court of how amazing an attorney he is. He notes, “I am a 40-year veteran of federal court litigation, predominantly in the fields of intellectual property, for which franchise law is a sub-category.” Of course, this is not accurate. While franchise law incorporates elements of intellectual property law, they are separate disciplines, each with its own statutes, case law, and best practices.
    He goes on to say, “Sea Tow holds a pristine relationship with truth, in its many activities, including as the “eyes and ears” of the U.S. Coast Guard.” Suffice it to say, the USCG may find this claim overstated as it had been protecting the coastline since 1790. It appears that Mr. Stein is attempting to whitewash the bad behavior of STSI by inflating its importance to the Coast Guard.
    He then goes on to cite a whole slew of excuses for the charges laid out in the Karol motion while never denying the validity of the motion. Stein’s letter also included an irrelevant reference to a Sir Francis Bacon quote from 1846, presumably to help elucidate Mr. Stein’s superior intelligence to the reader. Unfortunately, the letter as a whole refutes that assumption.
    Stein’s letter was met by an immediate electronic order setting a hearing on the motion that states: “A hearing is set before Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke regarding DEs [241] and [242] for 10/16/2023 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 820 of the Central Islip Courthouse.”
    John Karol, counsel for the Jaeger’s, points out in his response to Stein’s letter (Doc 246, 08/31/2023) that the timing and content of the letter were inappropriate. He goes on to criticize Mr. Stein for making other improper filings, prolonging the discovery process, and not adhering to court rules. These actions have led to increased costs and delays for the Jaegers. The court filing argues that it’s not just Mr. Altman’s (previous counsel for Sea Tow) fault, but a pattern of behavior by Sea Tow. The document suggests that Sea Tow is bound by the actions of its legal counsel, based on precedent, and that their conduct has had detrimental impacts on the other parties involved in the litigation, particularly the Jaegers.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top